Consumers are one tiny step closer to being able to take their phones to another carrier when they switch service providers.
Members
of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday unanimously voted to
approve a bill that will make it easier for consumers to unlock their
cell phones. Once unlocked, wireless subscribers can then take those
phones to a different wireless operator.
This bill, along with a bill passed by the House of Representatives in February,
would repeal a 2012 decision by the Library of Congress that made cell
phone unlocking a violation of the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright
Act. The DMCA, which prohibits Americans from "circumventing"
technologies that protect copyrighted works, gives the Library of
Congress the authority to grant exemptions. Last year, the Library of
Congress opted not to renew the DMCA exemption for cell phone unlocking,
which it had granted in 2006 and 2010.
The change caused a stir in the wireless community, and an online petition garnered some 114,322 signatures and won approval of President Obama.
"With
today's strong bipartisan vote in the Judiciary Committee, I hope the
full Senate can soon take up this important legislation that supports
consumer rights," Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the committee chairman,
said in a statement.
Unlocking a cell phone is important for consumers who travel abroad
and for those who want to take their devices to other carriers. The
reason why is that most devices sold in the US through wireless
operators have a software lock on them which prohibits them from being
used on another operator's network. The ban on unlocking put a roadblock
in the way for consumers who wanted to use their devices on other
networks.
That said, wireless operators have always unlocked
devices upon request, although in recent years they have gotten more
stringent regarding their requirements. Now most wireless operators
require customers to own their devices outright before they are able to
request an unlock code.
This requirement hasn't gone away in
either bill. Wireless operators are only required to unlock devices that
are fully paid for. In other words, if you are still under contract
with your carrier and you bought a device at a subsidized price, your
wireless operator doesn't have to unlock your phone. And in many
instances, the carrier won't.
The Senate bill that has moved out
of committee is similar to the House bill that passed earlier in the
year. But it has one key difference. The House bill only applies to
individuals looking to unlock a single device. It specifically prohibits
companies from unlocking cell phones in bulk. This is important because
there are many companies that resell cell phones or unlock devices for
consumers that would be protected under the Senate version of the bill.
Consumer
activists said they are pleased that Congress is responding to the
public outcry regarding this issue. And they are happy that the Senate
bill offers more flexibility in unlocking, so that consumers can get
help from third-party "unlocking" sites.
"This is critical for
those who need technical assistance to unlock their device," Laura Moy,
staff attorney for Public Knowledge, said in a statement. "We are also
pleased that a recent amendment to the bill removed language about bulk
unlocking, which -- like individual unlocking -- has nothing to do with
copyright law."
The wireless industry supports both bills. And in December, the Federal Communications Commission reached an agreement with the top five wireless operators in the US regarding unlocking. A new law would ensure that this right is protected.
Even
though operators have agreed to unlock devices and Congress is working
to ensure that right becomes law, other technical roadblocks will keep
most consumers from truly being able to take their devices with them
when they switch carriers.
The reason why is that not all US
wireless operators use the same network technologies or the same radio
frequencies to offer their service. For instance, AT&T and T-Mobile
have built their networks on a technology called GSM. Phones designed
for these networks are the most flexible, because GSM is the same
technology that is used throughout the world. And wireless users can
switch carriers on unlocked GSM devices simply by swapping out a SIM
card.
It's not as simple for wireless customers on Verizon or
Sprint, which use a technology called CDMA for their basic voice
service. This technology does not use a SIM card, so even if the device
is unlocked, a Verizon customer can't slip in a Sprint SIM card and get
voice service on Sprint. The device must still be "provisioned" on the
new carrier.
In a few years, the landscape will hopefully change
as more operators move to the next generation of network technology: 4G
LTE. But even then, the transition may not be completely seamless and
devices made for different carriers may not be interchangeable.
There
are two reasons for this. First, even though all four major US wireless
operators are deploying 4G LTE, the technology is mostly used for data
services. Voice service on these networks still uses the older GSM or
CDMA technology. And second, even though these carriers are all
deploying the same 4G LTE network technology, they're using different
radio frequencies to deploy the service. Until the carriers overlap more
in terms of the spectrum they are using to build the service, we are
still likely to have incompatible devices among carriers.
Wireless
operators are beginning to deploy voice over LTE services, and some are
deploying LTE on the same spectrum bands, which means the future looks
bright for true device interoperability.
And someday if companies
don't put any software locks on devices, then we'll truly be able to
take any mobile device to any wireless carrier. But that's a long way
off. For now, consumers will have to be satisfied with this initial baby
step.